|
February 05, 2005
Narrow minded, naturally
Here's another example of what happens when environmentalists run cities: perfectly good roads are deliberately ruined: Many astounded Berkeley residents pleaded with City Council members Tuesday, asking them not to interfere with Marin Avenue, slated for reconfiguration of lanes in Albany and proposed for the same in Berkeley. But an equal number applauded the city for attempting to make a safer and quieter street out of this four-lane roadway.Yeah, well you should have thought about environmentalists in government before you bought the house in these here hills, buddy! If they had their way, they'd tear down your house and route a creek through it. Narrowing streets is only a first step! But for now, the meme is that streets are for people, not for cars! And bicycles are people! Cars aren't! Cars consume oil, which is bad, and they contribute to war! Long term, the question really becomes, should streets exist at all? Steven Malcolm Anderson wondered in a comment why I bother to write about idiotic environmentalism. I guess it's because they have the podium, and for some reason they're always allowed the moral authority by default -- which allows them to win by a process of shaming others. I happen to think that if there is such a thing as morality, the environmentalists the ones who are immoral, and profoundly so. They oppose human progess in the name of a contradiction, for we are as much a part of "the environment" as Bambi, botulism, asbestos, or lead. Their sanctimonious bilge about "nature" makes about as much sense to me as the moralistic invocations of "nature" and "nature's god" to condemn men for "unnatural" orgasms. It's equally magical, mystical and Puritanical. Such people want to rule the world, of course, so they use nonsense logic and ill-defined terminology to do it. Naturally (for lack of a better word), the City of Berkeley is run by them: Presently, bicycle activists run Berkeley's Transportation Commission, known around City Hall as the Bicycle Commission. The bicycle recreational lobby, which sees itself as a church of ecological salvation and its fanatic disciples as superheroes in Spandex, seeks a flexing of its muscles, not paths needed by civilized bicyclists. These zealots see road constrictions not as safety measures taken in the interest of pedestrians, but as means to get large numbers of motor vehicles, eventually all of such, off all the rights of way they feel are their inheritance in this, as they perceive it, post-private-automobile era. The Internet is filled with the fantasies of these vastly overspoken, underwheeled ideological blokes who, in most of their power plays, are not seeking safety, not even their own. They fantasize that choking traffic will cause a significant number of commuters to switch to public transportation or... you guessed it ... bicycles! Give me a brake (but no derailleur)!Reconsidered? Dream on. Might as well ask Donald Wildmon or Robert Knight to "reconsider" their opposition to homos. Anyway, the road will be narrowed. In the name of morality! As for the traffic and congestion, those who despoil nature have no right to complain! MORE: Bear in mind that bad ideas start here. posted by Eric on 02.05.05 at 12:46 PM
Comments
legalize something traditionally forbidden Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · February 5, 2005 02:56 PM Robert James Bidinotto's ecoNOT Web site. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · February 5, 2005 03:10 PM To paraphrase Heinlein You gotta wonder about people who accept dams that beavers build as a "part of nature" but not ones built by man. Radical environmentalists are the epitome of misanthropes. Darleen · February 5, 2005 04:27 PM Am I off, or wasn't Marin a pretty narrow road as it approached Grizzly? I actually raked a layer of paint off a parked car while trying to get up Marin [?] once when I met an oncoming car, as the horrified owners, who just happened to be walking out, watched. I had not allowed for a 1 1/2" external door hinge which protruded from a van I was driving. Curses! I was sure I had it made. If this be the case, Marin needs to be widened up there, imho, at least so that people can get down without fear or oppression to watch the Pelican dances. J. Peden · February 5, 2005 09:34 PM I need to get back to work writing that big thing on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional spectra. So far, I've described 10, but there are more to go. And, after that, at least one more such post on some more such spectra of major significance. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · February 6, 2005 01:04 PM Joseph, it sounds like you know the turf around here! Eric Scheie · February 9, 2005 02:57 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Quite right about environmentalism and its contradictions. Here's a good site dedicated to exposing the fallacies of environmentalism:
http://www.econot.com/
All too true that too many have conceded moral authority to the radical environmentalists, the "don't build anything!" crowd, the man-haters. Just as all too many have conceded moral authority to the Donald Wildmons and Robert Knights, and for the same reason. The book is buried somewhere on my bookshelves and I'm too lazy to look it up right now, but, in his "The Quintessence of Ibsenism", George Bernard Shaw noted that, if somebody wants to legalize something tradition, he or she is looked on as an immoral libertine, but if somebody wants to prohibit something traditionally enjoyed, he or she is looked on as a moral authority.
I agree with George Orwell that saints should be presumed guilty until proven innocent.