|
December 05, 2004
Criminalizing a crime epidemic
If you live in Philadelphia today, it's time to be scolded in a front page Sunday sermon about how guns are killing children: Philadelphia has a thriving market in illegal handguns, often purchased legally by people who resell them on the streets.But very few of what most people think of as "real" children (the pre-teen group) are killed by gunfire. The overwhelming majority of them are victims of parental child abuse or arson. But our sermon has barely begun. "How many funerals, how many marches, how many hospital visits does it take before people say it's time to take action?" asks Shelly Yanoff, executive director of Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth.Take action? How does one take action against what the Inquirer itself describes as "a thriving market in illegal handguns?" By enforcing the law? No; the push is for more laws. Featured in the hard copy (but not the Internet version) is Dorothy Johnson-Speight (founder of anti-gun group Mothers in Charge), a woman who tragically lost a son who was shot to death by a psychopath angry about a parking dispute: Khaaliq Jabbar Johnson, 24, was gunned down early on a Thursday morning over a parked car.Twice convicted for gun offenses? And the solution is more laws? Why can't people ask an obvious question: why would a psychopath like this observe laws he'd repeatedly been convicted of violating? The killer, Ernest Odom, is a multiple murderer who continues his psychotic behavior in prison: While on trial for the Dec. 6, 2001, killing of Khaaliq Jabbar Johnson, Odom, 28, allegedly had a homemade knife strapped to his leg when he returned to Curran-Fromhold prison.I certainly do not blame Ms. Johnson-Spreight for being on a mission. But are more laws going to stop murderers like Odom? How about law enforcement? Psychiatrist Paul J. Fink (who ought to know better than to use words like "epidemic" to describe crime) also thinks more gun laws are the solution: Paul J. Fink, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at Philadelphia's Temple University School of Medicine, chairs the American Psychiatric Association's task force on psychiatric aspects of violence. "There is a real epidemic of intermittent disasters that are difficult to classify and to lump into a single definition," he told Psychiatric Times. "There is a fabric of multiple reasons why we are looking down the barrel at these various mass murders."Gun control? Never mind how many gun control laws are already being violated; the problem is always that there aren't enough laws. How about at least kicking the dangerous "children" out of school? Fink believes that's a no-no -- as suspending kids from school contributes to murder: "Another great marker for killing somebody or getting killed was multiple [school] suspensions," said psychiatrist Paul J. Fink, who cofounded the group. "We worked hard to get the school district to try to figure out what was wrong rather than to keep suspending him."I suspect that there are a lot of people who'd rather not have dangerous criminals in schools at all -- regardless of what might have gone wrong with them. But the fault is always with someone else -- in this case, with the law abiding people whose guns haven't yet been criminalized or taken away. Or the guns themselves. Another local anti-gun activist, Bilal Qayyum, complains that guns are as easy to buy as drugs: In Philadelphia, the drug trade has spawned a flourishing traffic in illegal guns that sprung up to bypass state and federal laws that prohibit felons from owning firearms.OK. Drug control has been solidly in place for many, many decades. Penalties are harsh. Yet there's still an "epidemic." Considering the track record of drug laws and the number of guns in existence, without even getting into the Second Amendment considerations, what makes them think that laws work? One solution supported by Mr. Qayyum has been simply buying the guns: May 6, 2004 5:40 pm US/EasternHey, why doesn't the city sponsor a drug purchase program too? If you just get enough money to buy the drugs, then there wouldn't be any more drugs. Simple logic, if you ask me! Drunk drivers kill lots of people too. When are we going to sponsor an alcohol purchase program? Or a turn-in-your-car day? The problem with alcohol and cars, obviously, is easy availability. It's so obvious to me that gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns that writing this post feels like an exercise in superfluity. But I feel compelled to write it anyway, because I don't think criminals are the target of the anti-gun activists. The target is everyone else. posted by Eric on 12.05.04 at 11:14 AM
Comments
Sounds like our friend Jeff Soyer at Alphecca, who calls criminals "mutants". His _style_! Gun control nuts piss me off too much for words. Every time somebody breaks a law, somebody else always proposes a new law. I would say let's enforce the laws we already have, except that we need to repeal the gun control laws that disarm the law-abiding and arm the criminals. That old bumper-sticker: "When Guns Are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns" -- if guns are outlawed, then I will be one of the outlaws. As the other bumper-sticker says: "They'll Get My Gun When They Pry It From My Cold, Dead Hands". The _style_ of that! The reason for that is that gun control actually does work. Ask the experts: Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot... The Second Amendment is as essential as the First Amendment. Never give up your gun. Never give up your freedom. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato theElder) the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · December 5, 2004 05:44 PM I'm surprised you geniuses haven't figured it out. For some of these guys and girls it is a defect of the brain or genetics. Probably not fixable currently. For most of them it is child abuse that sets them on the wrong path. Along with a genetic susceptability. Which is why equal abuse doesn't always lead to equal results. The same is true of chronic drug users. In fact we would probably see a lot less violence if we let these people self medicate with the drug of their choice at a reasonable price. Cannaninoids - the Key to Many Pains Capitalism Pain and the War On Drugs But beyond all that. If we are really serious about reducing the number of criminals we are going to have to do a better job as parents. In fact it is my contention that horrible parenting is responsible for our Middle East Problems. See Alice Miller's piece about Hitler for more details. M. Simon · December 6, 2004 01:38 PM I'm not saying that at the current time we may have to kill them or jail them. Evil is usually done to children before they start returning it to us as adults. We must hold the perpetrators responsible. With some reasonable amout of compassion. The intersection between brain science, genetics, and social interaction is going to change a lot in the way we look at human behavior. M. Simon · December 6, 2004 01:42 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's amazing that it is still necessary to write to the effect you just have. Where have these gun-blaming mutants been for the past 40-4 billion years?
What we see represented by their illogic are thought defects, which appear to be intractable and largely genetic. I suppose this is a valuable lesson of life, that the mutants will always rise again. Power to the mutants! Well, maybe they are not really mutants, but rather an enriching aspect of Diversity. Perhaps they serve to keep us on our toes and thirsting ever onward for explanations. But couldn't this have been accomplished by some other means? I guess not.
All together now, in your deepest bass: I gets weary and sick of trying, I'm tired of living and feared of dying....