Criminalizing a crime epidemic

If you live in Philadelphia today, it's time to be scolded in a front page Sunday sermon about how guns are killing children:

Philadelphia has a thriving market in illegal handguns, often purchased legally by people who resell them on the streets.

In some neighborhoods, gun trafficking is barely hidden, experts say.

"On Saturdays, the gun sellers... roam the inner-city neighborhoods, selling guns out of the trunks of their cars to anyone with the money," said Elijah Anderson, a professor of social sciences at the University of Pennsylvania and an authority on the causes of urban violence.

Anderson said the cheapest weapons were those known to have been used in a murder. On the street, they're known as "guns with a body on them."

"We have guns everywhere now," said David Fattah, cofounder of the House of Umoja, which runs one of the city's oldest antiviolence programs. "You have people riding through neighborhoods selling guns from the back of their cars."

Last year, 171 young people were shot at in the city. Most of them were wounded, police say.

Philadelphia has long sought to stem the tide of illegal weapons. A bill to limit gun purchases in Pennsylvania to one a month is stalled in Harrisburg.

"Guns are one of the most serious issues we have to address," said Paul J. Fink, who chairs a multi-agency group that has reviewed every youth homicide in Philadelphia since 1995.

Their study found that guns were involved in 91 percent of killings involving 18- and 19-year-olds and 59 percent of those younger.

"People are going to get killed," said Bilal Qayyum, a leader of Men United for a Better Philadelphia, an antiviolence group. "There's going to be stabbings, bats, but the easy availability of guns is creating this explosion."

But very few of what most people think of as "real" children (the pre-teen group) are killed by gunfire. The overwhelming majority of them are victims of parental child abuse or arson.

But our sermon has barely begun.

"How many funerals, how many marches, how many hospital visits does it take before people say it's time to take action?" asks Shelly Yanoff, executive director of Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth.
Take action? How does one take action against what the Inquirer itself describes as "a thriving market in illegal handguns?" By enforcing the law? No; the push is for more laws.

Featured in the hard copy (but not the Internet version) is Dorothy Johnson-Speight (founder of anti-gun group Mothers in Charge), a woman who tragically lost a son who was shot to death by a psychopath angry about a parking dispute:

Khaaliq Jabbar Johnson, 24, was gunned down early on a Thursday morning over a parked car.

At the time, Johnson, who worked with kids who had behavioral problems, had lived in the Olney neighborhood just three weeks. He'd moved from Mount Airy to share a house on American Street near Champlost Avenue with his brother, Shamsid-Din Jabbar, in November 2001.

It didn't take long for Johnson to meet his neighbor Ernest Odom, 28, who had been convicted twice for gun offenses. Odom screamed at Johnson about a friend who had parked on the curb of the narrow street outside their houses. Johnson, who had just been accepted into an accelerated master's program at a Delaware college, went next door to try to calm Odom.

Two days later, about 3:30 a.m. on Dec. 6, Johnson returned home after driving a friend home. He parked his Jeep in the back. But someone else had parked on the curb out front, and in the dead of night, Odom was quietly waiting.

Johnson headed up the sidewalk to his front door when Odom ambushed him. He pumped eight bullets into Johnson's torso and legs. When the gun jammed, Odom stood over Johnson's body and kicked him in the face, said Assistant District Attorney Judith Rubino, who prosecuted the case.

Twice convicted for gun offenses? And the solution is more laws? Why can't people ask an obvious question: why would a psychopath like this observe laws he'd repeatedly been convicted of violating?

The killer, Ernest Odom, is a multiple murderer who continues his psychotic behavior in prison:

While on trial for the Dec. 6, 2001, killing of Khaaliq Jabbar Johnson, Odom, 28, allegedly had a homemade knife strapped to his leg when he returned to Curran-Fromhold prison.

Since January, he has allegedly stabbed two inmates and assaulted a prison guard. Last month, he was sentenced to life in prison for killing Johnson. His trial for the slaying of Justin Donnelly is scheduled for April.

"He's a clear danger, even in custody," said Assistant District Attorney Judith Rubino, who prosecuted the case. "He's a nasty, violent guy."

Johnson's and Donnelly's mothers, Dorothy Johnson-Speight and Ruth Donnelly, are on a mission to stop people like Odom. Johnson-Speight spearheads a group, Mothers In Charge, to end violence and make neighborhoods safe.

I certainly do not blame Ms. Johnson-Spreight for being on a mission. But are more laws going to stop murderers like Odom? How about law enforcement?

Psychiatrist Paul J. Fink (who ought to know better than to use words like "epidemic" to describe crime) also thinks more gun laws are the solution:

Paul J. Fink, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at Philadelphia's Temple University School of Medicine, chairs the American Psychiatric Association's task force on psychiatric aspects of violence. "There is a real epidemic of intermittent disasters that are difficult to classify and to lump into a single definition," he told Psychiatric Times. "There is a fabric of multiple reasons why we are looking down the barrel at these various mass murders."

Part of the reason for this epidemic, Fink said, is the increased predilection of individuals to respond violently to problems and frustrations. He blamed, to a significant extent, the news and entertainment media, which "glorify gratuitous violence, and have made it part of the American culture." These images have become commonplace, he explained. Adults see them regularly and, more worrisome, so do children.

Fink also said that over the past several decades there have been growing numbers of "disaffiliated kids" without two parents. They either have "multiple parents" or only one, and that is a disaster for many children who need an intimate, family-based support system. In addition, too many children in America are brutalized, either physically or through neglect, and they grow up to repeat these violent acts.

Children who are traumatized by witnessing or experiencing criminal or family violence often go untreated, said Fink. Meanwhile, these shootings are committed by adults and children who have grievances and frustrations but not the life skills to deal with them, so they are only left with revenge as a motivation. Although revenge has been around for a long time, Fink added, the hundreds of millions of readily available guns in the United States allow ready access to the means to accomplish savage payback.

As a result, Fink said he believes firmer gun control and greater attention to children when they are young are keys to ultimately resolving the problem.

Gun control? Never mind how many gun control laws are already being violated; the problem is always that there aren't enough laws.

How about at least kicking the dangerous "children" out of school? Fink believes that's a no-no -- as suspending kids from school contributes to murder:

"Another great marker for killing somebody or getting killed was multiple [school] suspensions," said psychiatrist Paul J. Fink, who cofounded the group. "We worked hard to get the school district to try to figure out what was wrong rather than to keep suspending him."
I suspect that there are a lot of people who'd rather not have dangerous criminals in schools at all -- regardless of what might have gone wrong with them.

But the fault is always with someone else -- in this case, with the law abiding people whose guns haven't yet been criminalized or taken away.

Or the guns themselves. Another local anti-gun activist, Bilal Qayyum, complains that guns are as easy to buy as drugs:

In Philadelphia, the drug trade has spawned a flourishing traffic in illegal guns that sprung up to bypass state and federal laws that prohibit felons from owning firearms.

"Kids can go on the corner and buy guns like they can buy drugs," said Bilal Qayyum, cochairman of Men United for a Better Philadelphia, an antiviolence group.

"If there was serious gun control and if there were fewer guns on the street, more than half these deaths would not have happened," Qayyum said.

OK. Drug control has been solidly in place for many, many decades. Penalties are harsh. Yet there's still an "epidemic." Considering the track record of drug laws and the number of guns in existence, without even getting into the Second Amendment considerations, what makes them think that laws work?

One solution supported by Mr. Qayyum has been simply buying the guns:

May 6, 2004 5:40 pm US/Eastern
PHILADELPHIA (KYW 1060) The groups behind a gun turn-in program in Philadelphia are upping the ante to get illegal guns off city streets. Bilal Qayyum, co-chair of Men United for a Better Philadelphia, says people can turn in a gun, no questions asked, to any police station.

"They will get a receipt to take to Cash Today Financial Center at 1418 Race Street, at which people will receive $100 cash and a $50 gift certificate to any Sneaker Villa. We really need to get to the conscious of the people of Philadelphia to do the right thing. Turn in the gun. If we were offering a penny, or nothing, the right thing to do is turn in a gun."

Hey, why doesn't the city sponsor a drug purchase program too? If you just get enough money to buy the drugs, then there wouldn't be any more drugs.

Simple logic, if you ask me!

Drunk drivers kill lots of people too. When are we going to sponsor an alcohol purchase program? Or a turn-in-your-car day?

The problem with alcohol and cars, obviously, is easy availability.

It's so obvious to me that gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns that writing this post feels like an exercise in superfluity. But I feel compelled to write it anyway, because I don't think criminals are the target of the anti-gun activists.

The target is everyone else.

posted by Eric on 12.05.04 at 11:14 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1789






Comments

It's amazing that it is still necessary to write to the effect you just have. Where have these gun-blaming mutants been for the past 40-4 billion years?

What we see represented by their illogic are thought defects, which appear to be intractable and largely genetic. I suppose this is a valuable lesson of life, that the mutants will always rise again. Power to the mutants! Well, maybe they are not really mutants, but rather an enriching aspect of Diversity. Perhaps they serve to keep us on our toes and thirsting ever onward for explanations. But couldn't this have been accomplished by some other means? I guess not.

All together now, in your deepest bass: I gets weary and sick of trying, I'm tired of living and feared of dying....

J. Peden   ·  December 5, 2004 03:49 PM

Sounds like our friend Jeff Soyer at Alphecca, who calls criminals "mutants". His _style_!

Gun control nuts piss me off too much for words. Every time somebody breaks a law, somebody else always proposes a new law. I would say let's enforce the laws we already have, except that we need to repeal the gun control laws that disarm the law-abiding and arm the criminals. That old bumper-sticker: "When Guns Are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns" -- if guns are outlawed, then I will be one of the outlaws. As the other bumper-sticker says: "They'll Get My Gun When They Pry It From My Cold, Dead Hands". The _style_ of that!

The reason for that is that gun control actually does work. Ask the experts: Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot...

The Second Amendment is as essential as the First Amendment. Never give up your gun. Never give up your freedom.

I'm surprised you geniuses haven't figured it out.

For some of these guys and girls it is a defect of the brain or genetics. Probably not fixable currently.

For most of them it is child abuse that sets them on the wrong path. Along with a genetic susceptability. Which is why equal abuse doesn't always lead to equal results. The same is true of chronic drug users. In fact we would probably see a lot less violence if we let these people self medicate with the drug of their choice at a reasonable price.

Cannaninoids - the Key to Many Pains

Addiction or Self Medication

Fear of Marijuana

Capitalism Pain and the War On Drugs

But beyond all that. If we are really serious about reducing the number of criminals we are going to have to do a better job as parents.

In fact it is my contention that horrible parenting is responsible for our Middle East Problems.

See Alice Miller's piece about Hitler for more details.

M. Simon   ·  December 6, 2004 01:38 PM

I'm not saying that at the current time we may have to kill them or jail them.

Evil is usually done to children before they start returning it to us as adults.

We must hold the perpetrators responsible. With some reasonable amout of compassion.

The intersection between brain science, genetics, and social interaction is going to change a lot in the way we look at human behavior.

M. Simon   ·  December 6, 2004 01:42 PM


March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits