|
October 26, 2004
NEWS BLAST FROM THE PAST!
Via Drudge (and in today's Philadelphia Inquirer, with a blaring headline) I see that 377 tons of explosives were missing in Iraq when American troops went in: According to NBCNEWS, the HMX and RDX explosives were already missing when the American troops arrived.According to this logic, if WMDs were discovered to have been moved to Syria (which some experts have alleged), that too would be just another example of Bush's "irresponsible" blundering. Now that I think about it, saying the WMDs were moved to Syria might not be a bad way to promote Kerry as NeoHawk. Well? Since when was consistency one of the rules? Besides, Kerry could argue that he wasn't inconsistent at all: "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." See? I told you Kerry knew they were there all along! MORE: According to Drudge, "60 Minutes" planned to recycle this news in an election eve report, but that apparently fell through once it was learned that the explosives had been moved before the invasion: We'll have to stay tuned for more last minute October surprise shopping..... MORE: The Kerry campaign has responded: The reporter who was actually traveling with the 101st Airborne in the report cited by the Bush campaign has clarified that the unit was not there to secure the massive weapons complex and it was merely a 'pit stop' on their way to Baghdad.Redstate (Via Michael Totten.) has more, and concludes that the cited NBC story "does not effectively debunk the New York Times." It occurs to me that whether the unit was "there to secure the complex" is not relevant to what was missing -- or whether there was anything to secure. (I still think Kerry ought to get more agressive with his second guessing -- and say that Bush missed the WMDs......) AND MORE: According to this report, Kerry can truthfully state WMDs were missing from al Qaqaa! (Via a comment at Redstate.) Fighting over old news is nothing new. MORE: For readers who aren't bored by such things, here's how the Philadelphia Inquirer chose to report the story. Kerry used the rally to criticize the Bush administration's handling of Iraq on a day when the International Atomic Energy Agency disclosed that nearly 380 tons of powerful conventional explosives were missing from the former Al-Qaqaa military installation, about 30 miles south of Baghdad.How typical of that mean, dishonest Bush campaign! How dare they cite an NBC News report from April 2003! If the Bush campaign cited the report, it must be wrong! (Which is why they buried the mention of the NBC news story as a Bush campaign line on page A17....) What's important for every Inquirer reader is what's in the big frontpage headline: Iraq explosives missing; Kerry faults President. posted by Eric on 10.26.04 at 12:03 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|