I patiently held my tongue while Cicero was compared unfavorably to Kerry. (As a debater, Kerry was called "better than Cicero" by Bush strategist Matthew Dowd.)
But now that I see that accusations of cheating by Kerry have become mainstream news, I feel obligated to defend Cicero's honor, as ridiculous as that might seem.
It may be doubted, indeed, whether any individual ever rose to power by more virtuous and truly honourable conduct; the integrity of his public life was only equalled by the correctness of his private morals; and it may at first sight excite our wonder that a course so splendidly begun should afterwards so little fulfil its early promise.
.....
His merits are of another kind and in a higher order of excellence. Antiquity may be challenged to produce a man more virtuous, more perfectly amiable than Cicero. None interest more in their life, none excite more painful emotions in their death. Others, it is true, may be found of loftier and more heroic character, who awe and subdue the mind by the grandeur of their views, or the intensity of their exertions. But {257} Cicero engages our affections by the integrity of his public conduct, the correctness of his private life, the generosity [Note 35], placability, and kindness of his heart, the playfulness of his wit, the warmth of his domestic attachments.
Kerry is of course a skilled debater, but he and Cicero are not cut from the same cloth. Cicero,while a great debater, was nonetheless concerned with ultimate truths -- and thus his writings and philosophy have withstood the test of time. Kerry is concerned with winning.
I must ask: precisely what is the purpose of debate? To win a contest or arrive at truth? What does it have to do with the presidency of the United States? If winning a debating contest is the goal, then it's all a game.
Might as well have Bush and Kerry each throw a javelin. We already know which man is taller; should we see who can run the fastest, jump the highest?
Indeed he was. Our Founding Fathers admired him, and in many ways they looked to the ancient Roman Republic for guidance. They were conservatives, guided by the wisdom and examples of the past, just as they were true liberals, defenders of individual liberty. The granite integrity of men like Cicero and of men like John Quincy Adams, is sorely missing from today's politicians.
Never forget that Cicero, an opponent of authoritarianism and constitutional change, was always a good Republican.
*wink*