|
October 03, 2004
And in this corner!
Where is there dignity unless there is honesty? So near is falsehood to truth that a wise man would do well not to trust himself on the narrow edge. ....the craftier and shrewder someone is, the more envied and mistrusted he becomes when his reputation for honesty has been lost. I patiently held my tongue while Cicero was compared unfavorably to Kerry. (As a debater, Kerry was called "better than Cicero" by Bush strategist Matthew Dowd.) But now that I see that accusations of cheating by Kerry have become mainstream news, I feel obligated to defend Cicero's honor, as ridiculous as that might seem. I say "ridiculous" because Cicero is considered to be one of the most honest men in history (honest to a fault, really): It may be doubted, indeed, whether any individual ever rose to power by more virtuous and truly honourable conduct; the integrity of his public life was only equalled by the correctness of his private morals; and it may at first sight excite our wonder that a course so splendidly begun should afterwards so little fulfil its early promise.Kerry is of course a skilled debater, but he and Cicero are not cut from the same cloth. Cicero,while a great debater, was nonetheless concerned with ultimate truths -- and thus his writings and philosophy have withstood the test of time. Kerry is concerned with winning. I must ask: precisely what is the purpose of debate? To win a contest or arrive at truth? What does it have to do with the presidency of the United States? If winning a debating contest is the goal, then it's all a game. Might as well have Bush and Kerry each throw a javelin. We already know which man is taller; should we see who can run the fastest, jump the highest? How might Cicero weigh in? (I think he's not amused....)
Obviously, it's time to keep all eyes on the ball, and not lose perspective.....
posted by Eric on 10.03.04 at 04:54 PM
Comments
Indeed he was. Our Founding Fathers admired him, and in many ways they looked to the ancient Roman Republic for guidance. They were conservatives, guided by the wisdom and examples of the past, just as they were true liberals, defenders of individual liberty. The granite integrity of men like Cicero and of men like John Quincy Adams, is sorely missing from today's politicians. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · October 4, 2004 11:55 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Never forget that Cicero, an opponent of authoritarianism and constitutional change, was always a good Republican.
*wink*