|
September 15, 2004
Laziness in the Academy
On my way to the library this morning I noticed a woman pushing a palm-button to open a door. Now, these are intended to assist the disabled who may not be able to open doors as easily as the rest of us, and I've always thought it a sign of extreme laziness when a person fully capable of opening a door in a traditional way uses the palm button. This woman grew angry when the door failed to open, and attacked the palm-button with repeated, violent stabs of her hand, before opening the door manually in frustration. I saw her a few minutes later at the library, again using the palm button, and in her haste she squeezed through the door as it opened, annoyed that it hadn't done so quicker. The irony of course is that opening a door manually is always faster, and she had created her frustration through her own laziness. A few seconds later I passed an office in the sociology wing and overheard a different kind of laziness. 'Well, to put that into a Marxist framework ...'' posted by Dennis on 09.15.04 at 10:55 AM
Comments
An elderly woman I knew in Berkeley had a very endearing habit: when she encountered disagreements (and many other things she found frustrating) she'd simply exclaim, "This is an old capitalist trick!" Too many years in the Grand Old Struggle, I guess.... Eric Scheie · September 15, 2004 03:02 PM The last example may not be laziness. It may be a genuine disability, the kind the first woman evidently lacked. Sigivald · September 15, 2004 03:10 PM I'm not handicapped, and I use those big fat square buttons alot (unless my use interfers with a genuine handicapped person). I like hitting buttons, especially in government buildings. My taxes paid for that button and I may as well get my money's worth. um - sorry to interupt your serious discussion, though. Carry on. Persnickety · September 16, 2004 01:54 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I remember writing a paragraph about the causes of the extensive famines in the USSR during the early Stalin era (short answer: Stalin caused them). The response: "A capitalist analysis...you should run this by a committed Marxist..." Like nothing could be true unless a "committed Marxist" agreed it was. (And in what sense did he use the word "committed?") Now there I give you laziness.
Of course, this dialogue took place in the Stupidest Blog in the World (www.nowarblog.org), so perhaps I should have known better...