|
August 26, 2004
Bigger competition?
Imagine the outcry if the Bush campaign were calling on Miramax to stop distributing "Fahrenheit 9/11," which really does have numerous proven falsehoods.-- James Taranto, Wall Street Journal Imagine..... I am so sick of politics that I feel like taking a break from writing about it. But I am more bothered by the hypocrisy than by the merits of charges and countercharges, and much as I wish both sides would respect the First Amendment rights of each other, I have a question. Why is it that the same people now screaming about a group of older veterans who questioned Kerry's war record didn't complain at all about a film whose central thesis is that Bush knew about 9/11 in advance, and worked in sinister partnership with Osama bin Laden? Unfit for Command is a book. Fahrenheit 9/11 is a movie. Here's a brief comparison. Here are Fahrenheit 9/11's gross receipts according to the IMDB: Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) $116,761,122 According to Moore, the film is targeting at least 2,000 screens. And Moore never made any bones about his goal of using the film as an organizing and recruitment tool: But the bad news for Bush supporters doesn't stop there. Moore plans to use the movie as an organizing tool. On June 28, he conducted a virtual town hall meeting with the liberal group MoveOn.org. Moore exhorted the 55,000 listeners who logged in or turned out at 4,600 MoveOn parties around the country to sign up as foot soldiers in an anti-Bush crusade. Once people see his flick, said Moore, anyone who once supported Bush and the war in Iraq "will feel deceived and betrayed, and they will respond with a vengeance." Unfit for Command had an initial printing of 85,000 copies; another run of 550,000 is planned, with one major bookseller facing accusations of not wanting to sell it, as well as pressure not to sell it: NEW YORK (AP) - The nation's two biggest bookstore chains, Barnes & Noble and Borders, say angry customers are accusing them of political bias as the retailers struggle to keep up with demand for a best seller that questions John Kerry's military service in Vietnam.I am not sure who stands to make more money, but common sense suggests that it's tougher for most people to read a book than to watch a movie, and when that is factored into the sales receipts, Moore would appear to have the advantage over the Swift Boat veterans. Even though "Unfit for Command" is ranked Number 1 at Amazon, assuming a million copies are sold (a generous assumption considering the initial run), the total receipts won't begin to approach the Moore film, nor will the former's total number of readers approach the total number of the latter's viewers. But Moore's film aside, the biggest competition the Swift Boat veterans face is, according to liberal cartoonist Tom Oliphant, the daily press! O'Neill: Jim, one other thing, they can look at swiftvets.com, which is the Web site that has a great deal of information on it.Yeah, I'd say the Swift Boat vets appear to be outgunned. posted by Eric on 08.26.04 at 09:06 AM
Comments
Oliphant blatantly admits, boasts, that the mass media really are just a tool of the Left, just as conservatives have been saying for decades. One thing I've been hearing from the Left for years is that the reason they keep losing elections (McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis...) is because they aren't getting their "message" across to the people. Hmmm.... "The New York Times", "The Washington Post", "The Los Angeles Times", "The Boston Globe", "Time", "Newsweek", "The Nation", "The New Republic", "The Progressive", CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, PBS, NPR, Air America, Hollyood, universities, etc., etc.. With all that, how can they possibly fail to get their "message" across? Or, what is their "message"? Or, do they have a "message" other than: "Bush is dumb", "Republicans are corrupt", "capitalism is exploitation", "religion (or Christianity) is superstition", "guns are evil", "white men are sexist, racist pigs", "America is imperialist", "Western civilization is oppression", "the human race is the cancer of the earth"? Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · August 26, 2004 09:27 PM also: "Jews are Zionist Nazis" Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · August 26, 2004 09:33 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Don't be surprised that the extreme left resorts to propaganda films.
When I was an undergraduate the 'radical student union' showed the film based on Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent. I actually owned and had already read the book, and their flyers seemed more than a little misleading about its conclusion.
(I haven't seen the film because frankly what's the point?)
I was sure they hadn't read the book because on their flyers they'd copied and pasted a quote from Chomsky taken not from any of his books, but from a Radiohead CD jacket which I recognized immediately.
Which reminds me of another event, which I really should devote a post to ...