|
July 20, 2004
"a silicon crystal doped with arsenic impurity"
Linda Ronstadt apparently enjoys starting fights: "My career has befuddled other people, and it's befuddled me," admitted Ronstadt, 58, who finds her fans are polarized by her nightly on-stage salute to "Fahrenheit 9/11" filmmaker Michael Moore.I'm a little befuddled too. (At least semi-befuddled.) I'd rather not have known that Linda Ronstadt loves Michael Moore, because now her music will remind me of unpleasant things. It's as if it's contaminated. I'm also befuddled by her statement that she'd rather not know that "somebody in the audience" is politically not to her liking. (I think Ronstadt's use of the term "Republican or fundamental Christian" to describe opposition to Michael Moore is disingenuous.) If she doesn't "want to know" about her fans' politics, then why is she deliberately inflaming them by dedicating a song to a man whose dedication to polarization is so clearly documented? And if she really hates only Republicans and fundamentalists and only wishes to inflame and polarize them, why use Michael Moore? Why not burn George W. Bush in effigy? Or burn a Bible? Very befuddling. As is this comment: "I don't understand this country sometimes and I really fear for it," she adds. "The government is making everybody in the world hate us, including the people that used to be our friends."I think she'll get her wish, because while she may not be making everyone in the world hate her, she's certainly alienating many of the people who used to be her friends. If annoying people makes her laugh, she must split her sides over scenes like this: The biggest excitement of the night, by a long shot, came when Ronstadt then dedicated her encore of "Desperado" to filmmaker Michael Moore, kick-starting a boo-cheer competition throughout the venue that drowned out her singing and left grown-ups in tuxes and evening gowns yelling at each other on their way to the parking lot. (Via Tim Blair.)By setting her own fans against each other, what is Linda Ronstadt trying to accomplish? Career poison? Not long ago, a science textbook was widely criticized for displaying a picture of Linda Ronstadt next to a caption reading "silicon crystal doped with arsenic impurity." Coincidence? Junk science? No; it's a basic principle that in order to make a semiconductor, you must introduce an impurity into the silicon crystal -- Arsenic, or Phosphorus will do. It's called doping. Perhaps the textbooks were right. In my opinion, anyone who would do to her fans what Ronstadt does has a poisoned silicon chip where her heart ought to be. posted by Eric on 07.20.04 at 03:08 PM
Comments
She thinks it's time for people to speak up, as long as those people aren't Republicans or Christians. And according to the more rabid of her fanbase, that makes her 'patriotic,' while those who state their disagreement with the woman are 'fascist.' How drug-addled can a thought process BE?! Don't answer that. Persnickety · July 21, 2004 09:40 AM No, Michael Moore is a Fascist whom Linda Ronstadt supports. What does this make her? I do not disagree with Linda Ronstadt's right to free speech, I disagree with her power over the bully pulpit. She is allowed to say whatever she wants because she is holding the microphone while the audience is required to either agree or are forced into silence? Something is wrong with this idea. The audience has just as much a right to express freedom of speech but, unfortunately, the audience does not have access to the microphone. Who is holding this power over the people? The Linda Ronstadt's and Michael Moore's of the world holding the microphone telling the people how to think, say, and feel. I am in the entertainment industry, and from my experience, freedom of expression belongs only to those who toe-the-Michael-Moore-fascists-line. In this industry, freedom of expression is far from free. syn · July 21, 2004 10:32 AM "It's a real conflict for me when I go to a concert and find out somebody in the audience is a Republican or fundamental Christian. It can cloud my enjoyment. I'd rather not know." What a ditz. Makes me want to wear a Nixon-Agnew button while handing her a Chick tract. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · July 21, 2004 12:55 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I do not like entertainers telling me I do have have the right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, particularily those entertainers holding the microphone telling I do not have rights to these freedom.
I do not think Ronstadt realizes Michael Moore is Leni Reifenstal in drag, the infamous Nazi propagandist. By supporting him, what does this make her?