"a silicon crystal doped with arsenic impurity"

Linda Ronstadt apparently enjoys starting fights:

"My career has befuddled other people, and it's befuddled me," admitted Ronstadt, 58, who finds her fans are polarized by her nightly on-stage salute to "Fahrenheit 9/11" filmmaker Michael Moore.

"I've been dedicating a song to him – I think he's a great patriot – and it splits the audience down the middle, and they duke it out," she said.

"This is an election year, and I think we're in desperate trouble and it's time for people to speak up and not pipe down. It's a real conflict for me when I go to a concert and find out somebody in the audience is a Republican or fundamental Christian. It can cloud my enjoyment. I'd rather not know."

I'm a little befuddled too. (At least semi-befuddled.) I'd rather not have known that Linda Ronstadt loves Michael Moore, because now her music will remind me of unpleasant things. It's as if it's contaminated.

I'm also befuddled by her statement that she'd rather not know that "somebody in the audience" is politically not to her liking. (I think Ronstadt's use of the term "Republican or fundamental Christian" to describe opposition to Michael Moore is disingenuous.) If she doesn't "want to know" about her fans' politics, then why is she deliberately inflaming them by dedicating a song to a man whose dedication to polarization is so clearly documented? And if she really hates only Republicans and fundamentalists and only wishes to inflame and polarize them, why use Michael Moore? Why not burn George W. Bush in effigy? Or burn a Bible?

Very befuddling.

As is this comment:

"I don't understand this country sometimes and I really fear for it," she adds. "The government is making everybody in the world hate us, including the people that used to be our friends."

Anyone who disagrees with that is welcome to get in line, behind whoever she manages to rile at the Aladdin this time.

"I keep hoping that if I'm annoying enough to them, they won't hire me back," she says with a laugh.

I think she'll get her wish, because while she may not be making everyone in the world hate her, she's certainly alienating many of the people who used to be her friends.

If annoying people makes her laugh, she must split her sides over scenes like this:

The biggest excitement of the night, by a long shot, came when Ronstadt then dedicated her encore of "Desperado" to filmmaker Michael Moore, kick-starting a boo-cheer competition throughout the venue that drowned out her singing and left grown-ups in tuxes and evening gowns yelling at each other on their way to the parking lot. (Via Tim Blair.)
By setting her own fans against each other, what is Linda Ronstadt trying to accomplish?

Career poison?

Not long ago, a science textbook was widely criticized for displaying a picture of Linda Ronstadt next to a caption reading "silicon crystal doped with arsenic impurity."

Coincidence?

Junk science?

No; it's a basic principle that in order to make a semiconductor, you must introduce an impurity into the silicon crystal -- Arsenic, or Phosphorus will do. It's called doping.

Perhaps the textbooks were right.

In my opinion, anyone who would do to her fans what Ronstadt does has a poisoned silicon chip where her heart ought to be.

posted by Eric on 07.20.04 at 03:08 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1201






Comments

I do not like entertainers telling me I do have have the right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, particularily those entertainers holding the microphone telling I do not have rights to these freedom.

I do not think Ronstadt realizes Michael Moore is Leni Reifenstal in drag, the infamous Nazi propagandist. By supporting him, what does this make her?

syn   ·  July 21, 2004 08:53 AM

She thinks it's time for people to speak up, as long as those people aren't Republicans or Christians. And according to the more rabid of her fanbase, that makes her 'patriotic,' while those who state their disagreement with the woman are 'fascist.'

How drug-addled can a thought process BE?!

Don't answer that.

Persnickety   ·  July 21, 2004 09:40 AM

No, Michael Moore is a Fascist whom Linda Ronstadt supports. What does this make her?

I do not disagree with Linda Ronstadt's right to free speech, I disagree with her power over the bully pulpit. She is allowed to say whatever she wants because she is holding the microphone while the audience is required to either agree or are forced into silence? Something is wrong with this idea.

The audience has just as much a right to express freedom of speech but, unfortunately, the audience does not have access to the microphone.

Who is holding this power over the people?

The Linda Ronstadt's and Michael Moore's of the world holding the microphone telling the people how to think, say, and feel.

I am in the entertainment industry, and from my experience, freedom of expression belongs only to those who toe-the-Michael-Moore-fascists-line. In this industry, freedom of expression is far from free.

syn   ·  July 21, 2004 10:32 AM

"It's a real conflict for me when I go to a concert and find out somebody in the audience is a Republican or fundamental Christian. It can cloud my enjoyment. I'd rather not know."

What a ditz. Makes me want to wear a Nixon-Agnew button while handing her a Chick tract.



March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits