![]() |
|
![]()
June 18, 2004
Moving on without gore....
All the gore notwithstanding, I was reminded that today is Friday, which is still supposed to be Online Test Day at Classical Values. So here we go. _____________________________________
You are Angel![]() "I could see your heart. You held it before you for everyone to see. . . . And more than anything in my life I wanted to keep it safe, to warm it with my own."" What "Buffy" Character Are You?
I note that Nick got the same result. (Always a good omen!) ____________________________________
This makes me feel like cheating once again, and I hate to do it, but I think Nick will forgive me, because I have read enough Jane Austen to know I am not in any of her novels. So here's my shamelessly cribbed result:
Sorry Nick! You may take whatever disciplinary action you deem in order! ________________________________________
I'm grandfathered in, of course.....
Back in the good old days, there weren't any law students, nor Buffy, nor Jane Austen novels. All we could do was grunt.... So here's a test from that era, the "Grunty Caveman Test."
Nggghhaahhh! to you too! _________________________________
_____________________________
The problem is, I'm not sure that "Damien" is my type! Despite what some of the new readers might think, I'm really not into GORE! But for those of you who haven't had enough GORE, well, have I got a treat for you! It's old now, and it was probably too grotesque for most people to handle then, but here it is anyway: Again, not my type! posted by Eric on 06.18.04 at 07:34 PM
Comments
Is Gore taking a crap at the podium? aaron wall · June 20, 2004 12:39 AM I like what you did with the Jane Austen quiz. Velociman came up with a similar approach to the whole quiz thing. triticale · June 20, 2004 10:48 PM Could someone tell me how you post pics in your threads? PLEEEEASE lynda · July 6, 2004 8:13 AM |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Why you might get more of what you try to stop
A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time People Are Not Rational No Biorobots For Japan The Thorium Solution Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera Voter Fraud? This war of attrition is driving me bananas! Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Some giant ant-eater, Marriane the Romantic, some beautiful wicked angel named Garnet.