|
May 08, 2004
A doomsday gap -- in reporting?
At long last, I have some good news (and, unfortunately, some bad news) to report from the Philadelphia Inquirer. I have been complaining for some time about the Inquirer's glaring lack of coverage of the U.N. Oil-for-Food scandal, but finally I am able to report that yesterday I got a call from Carl Lavin, Deputy Managing Editor/News. Mr. Lavin, who was quite courteous, apologized for taking so long to call me back, and said that he was replying to my call about the U.N. scandal. I explained that I was a lifelong reader, but that I was very disappointed in the Inquirer because this very serious story had received a great deal of worldwide coverage, and it appeared that the Inquirer was ignoring it. I reminded Mr. Lavin of the Inquirer's stated commitment to "the importance of an informed electorate." Mr. Lavin said that the Inquirer is aware of the U.N. scandal, that he is aware that some people have complained about the lack of reporting, but that they are doing the best they can with the resources they have. "Don't feel that we are ignoring the story," was his reassuring bottom line. Whether my feelings count or not, I do appreciate a polite call like that, but I knew that the Inquirer is aware of the U.N. scandal; otherwise, why would they carry a story at their website that never ran in the paper? Since the UNSCAM story broke, I have searched the Inquirer daily in vain looking for any coverage. I can't find any. The big story this week has been torture in Iraq, Rumsfeld on the spot, Kerry invoking Harry Truman to criticize Bush, and the like. Not enough resources for even a mention of the biggest scandal to hit the U.N., though. Not enough room in the paper, perhaps? Yet there was room in today's paper -- on page two no less -- for a fascinating piece of international news. The subject was another Vietnamese anniversary! Another anniversary? So close to Mother's Day? Yes Mom! Anniversaries count. I guess in the spirit of last Saturday's May Day anniversary report on the fall of Saigon, today there was this stirring report of the anniversary of the victory against foriegn imperialism at Dien Bien Phu: Vietnam marks anniversary of victory over French in '54Well, there you have it, straight from the source: IRAQ IS VIETNAM! We should have learned our lessons, shouldn't we? It's one thing to feature the Dien Bien Phu story while ignoring the United Nations scandal, and I guess you could argue that the stern warnings from Vietnam's Stalinist gerontocracy are only being reported as accurately as possible. Now, it wouldn't be nice to accuse the Inky of siding with ancient Stalinist enemies of the United States. But -- I must take issue with the claim that Dien Bien Phu "foreshadowed the doom that would come to U.S. forces 20 years later." American forces fought the North Vietnamese army to better than a stalemate. They came to the peace table, and signed the Kissinger/Le Duc Tho agreement to leave South Vietnam alone. Only then were U.S. forces withdrawn and P.O.W.s repatriated. This was called "Peace with Honor" by President Nixon, who was a tough enough son of a bitch to have enforced it, as the enemy well knew. But when Nixon was removed from office, the whole deal changed. Within months, the North Vietnamese invaded the South, and the United States abandoned its treaty commitments. (Here's a fairly good chronology of events.) Try as I might, I can't characterize an orderly U.S. withdrawal after a peace treaty with the word "doom." Historians can argue about the wisdom of abandoning South Vietnam, but the simple fact is, the U.S. forces had beaten the enemy back, and were not there when the "doom" arrived. A good argument can be made that South Vietnam was doomed by Watergate, however. Might that be the kind of doom the Inquirer intends to foreshadow? (Just asking....) posted by Eric on 05.08.04 at 08:23 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|