|
September 07, 2003
Stop hate! Restore fairness and balance!
It's nostalgia time, so please indulge me as I revisit some (mostly) old news. (It may be paranoia on my part, but I think it is very easy for us as Americans -- and I include myself -- to forget the value of our freedom, and the nature of those who would jump at the opportunity to take it away.) As anyone who read 1984 will remember, Big Brother ruled not so much by governmental decrees and law enforcement, but by interactive media, i.e., rule by "The Telescreen." I have long believed that when Big Media finally merges with Big Government, the real time of Big Brother will have arrived. The United States still has stubbornly resilient written document called the Constitution, however, so horrors like this will take a bit more time to implement. It is ironic that the people we entrust to be the watchdogs against totalitarian evil would become its progenitors, even enforcers, but such is the nature of power. (Lord Acton was right of course.) Great Britain is ahead of us, for there is no First Amendment hurdle to be overcome by Patriot Acts or compliant courts. The result? [T]he job of spying on British citizens has been franchised out to that "much loved" institution, the BBC. As Mr Lewis says, that is not their role. Later on in the post some Radio Nederlands commentary is quoted saying that it might be better to have "trained journalists" doing the monitoring than others. Not surprising, I suppose, that the trained journalists at Radio Nederlands rate their fellow trained journalists at the BBC as the best people to employ for this task. I must disagree: if I had to choose I'd rather be spied on by professional spies. At least they live in the real world, and in particular have the peril of Islamofascism very much in the forefront of their minds. I'd trust them way above the BBC to be able to tell the difference between clear statements warning against Islamofascism and genuine hate speech [footnote].Couple the above with this report about European criminalization of disagreement with the courts (as "hate speech"), and it doesn't take much imagination to see that freedom is little more than a memory in Europe. The Iron Curtain (and its physical manifestation, Berlin Wall) once separated freedom from Totalitarianism. In a world without borders, where freedom is constantly encroached, where does freedom find safe places? How about the blogosphere? A new word for partakers in computer-assisted free speech, this is one of the few checks and balances which, thanks to the First Amendment, appeared almost out of nowhere and now stands squarely in the way of these abuses. Recall this recent language (conveniently not available for downloading!) from The London Times: A proliferating band of independent writers known as "bloggers" (short for web loggers) is pumping out personal takes on the news, and one of the most persistent themes of their websites has been that Howell Raines, executive editor of The New York Times, would have to resign or be sacked. There is of course already a legislative movement afoot to restrict blogging in Europe. Here in the U.S., the first volley in the Cold War against bloggers has already been fired. Bill O'Reilly was the right man at the right time for this perfidious piece of work -- his carefully cultivated, grass-rootish pose as leader of opposition to Big Liberal Media providing him with the perfect cover. Dan Rather or Peter Jennings could never have gotten away with comments like these (via James Lileks): ....[T]hey work for no one. They put stuff up with no restraints. This, of course, is dangerous, but it symbolizes what the Internet is becoming.When freedom is unpatrolled, polluted, crude, gossipy, slanderous, libelous, unrestrained, vile, and dangerous, something must be done. This is a global phenomenon, and countries must work together -- with the help of media watchdogs like O'Reilly and the BBC -- to do it. "All hail America's fair and balanced Blog Czar! We who are about to blog salute you!" UPDATE: There is already a movement in Congress to regulate content of talk radio shows by forcing them to provide "fair comment." Talk radio (the first generation of interactive media) is a predecessor of blogging, and if this insidious form of censorship (disguised as "fairness") can be imposed, is blogging next? posted by Eric on 09.07.03 at 11:21 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|