Saved from the nanny state scalpel

Great news!

I just heard from a friend that AB 1634 (the subject of at least a dozen blog posts here) appears to be dead -- at least for the time being:

Legislation to require statewide spaying or neutering of dogs and cats was shelved Wednesday after receiving a chilly reception by a Senate committee.

Assemblyman Lloyd Levine opted not to pursue a vote after it became clear that the Senate Local Government Committee would not accept a last-ditch amendment to narrow the scope of his bill.

Levine vowed to revive Assembly Bill 1634 next year.

"I think we can get to a solution," Levine said. "But the first thing opponents must do is to acknowledge that there's a problem and work with me to solve it."

AB 1634 was a legislative lightning rod that prompted more than 20,000 people to send letters or sign petitions in support or opposition.

Spectators began lining up outside the Capitol about 6 a.m. Wednesday, nearly two hours before the session of the Senate Local Government Committee.

It certainly has been a lightning rod. Tens of thousands of opponents contacted their representatives, to the point of breaking one senator's fax machine:
AB 1634 has produced some of the year's most passionate, crowded and contentious legislative hearings, routinely attracting more than 400 supporters and opponents.

Roughly 20,000 people have sent letters or signed petitions to argue their case to members of the Senate Local Government Committee, according to a Senate analysis of AB 1634.

"They've broken my fax machine," said Negrete McLeod, smiling.

The clincher may have been a surge of dissent through the ranks of veterinarians:
The campaign promoting AB 1634 received a blow last week when the California Veterinary Medical Association, a former co-sponsor, switched its position to neutral because of division within its ranks.
Good for them. Maybe they thought it over and realized that the bill would interfere with practicing veterinary medicine as they see fit (and maybe it occurred to them that patients might hesitate to bring in pets once it dawned on them that they were going to be ratted out).

In any event, I'm glad that this outrage of nanny statism has been defeated for now. But "Lightbulb Levine" vows he'll be back, and I believe him.

posted by Eric on 07.11.07 at 07:43 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/5242






Comments

I'm delighted to hear that!

Empire1   ·  July 11, 2007 07:53 PM

At least the removal of the bill gives some time to get accurate information out there. I have been to all the hearings....and walked the halls of that Capitol a number of times, trying to explain to aides, whoever, do we really need this bill? It is important that public policy should be based on complete and accurate information, not who makes the greatest emotional plea. And from several studies, a large number of dog owners already s/n, upwards of over 80%.....What the real problem is....a lack of commitment...and AB1634 would not address that......

And thanks Eric for all your posts on this....enjoyed reading them!!

Terry

TEH   ·  July 12, 2007 12:00 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits